Andrew Leigh

Dr LEIGH (Fraser) (15:53): In mid-2009, the then Leader of the Opposition, Malcolm Turnbull, decided he would bring back an old stunt from the Liberal Party—the notion of a debt truck. He put a debt truck on the road, sat at its wheel and said that under Labor gross debt might go to $315 billion. That, he thought, was so terrifying that the Australian people had to be warned about it. Well, it is instructive to look at the budget papers to see where gross debt will be under the Turnbull government. Under the Turnbull government, gross debt is going not to $315 billion but to $624 billion. Gross debt will be nearly twice as large as when Malcolm Turnbull got his first debt truck. I have news for the Prime Minister: it is time to trade in his debt truck and buy a debt B-double. 

Dr LEIGH (Fraser) (11:39): I move:

That this bill be now read a second time.

The image of blue Caribbean seas, golden island sands and a lonely coconut palm standing above a spot marked X on a faded map remains a powerful image in our social mythology.

And well it might, because the notion of buried treasure in the Caribbean is no myth. In the 2012 American election there was widespread outrage at the notion that Mitt Romney had been keeping a significant share of his wealth in the Cayman Islands. Perhaps this was because he and other wealthy people with money to hide from tax had noticed that the previous year the Tax Justice Network's Financial Secrecy Index had declared the Cayman Islands to be the world's second most significant tax haven. 

Dr LEIGH (Fraser) (16:30): The 2016 Lunar New Year celebrations, acknowledging the Year of the Monkey, were recently hosted by the member for Berowra, the Father of the House, and me here in one of our courtyards. Members and senators were joined by community representatives including Sam Wong AM; Donni and Samuel Pho, from the Australian Salvation Army; Mrs Chin Wong; and Gary Lee, the 2016 New Australian of the Year. The Leader of the Opposition, Bill Shorten, also spoke at the celebrations and welcomed the inauguration of what will hopefully be an annual fixture on the parliamentary calendar. We launched traditional floating lanterns into one of the parliamentary ponds—possibly the first time this has happened—and then moved to the public lawns on Federation Mall to enjoy the skills of David Wong's Prosperous Mountain Lion Dance group. 

Dr LEIGH (Fraser) (15:56): I was holding a street stall recently when a young couple came up to chat about their troubles buying a first home. She was a teacher, he was a builder, and they were thinking about having a family but they were worried that they would not be able to meet the mortgage repayments when their two incomes went down to one. Despite being in their late 20s, this couple were looking at moving back in with their in-laws. Changing nappies and juggling sleepless nights under the same roof as their in-laws was not their idea of the Australian dream. But their story is, sadly, typical. 

E&OE TRANSCRIPT

RADIO INTERVIEW

3AW WITH TOM ELLIOT

FRIDAY, 6 MAY 2016

SUBJECT/S: 2016 Budget.

TOM ELLIOT, PRESENTER: On the line now is the Shadow Assistant Treasurer, Andrew Leigh. Good afternoon.

ANDREW LEIGH, SHADOW ASSISTANT TREASURER: Good Afternoon Tom, how are you?

ELLIOT: Good, thank you. Now I saw Mr Shorten’s budget-reply speech and I have seen a summary of the savings measures. You claim to have found $71 billion, but of that $71 billion, $49 billion is rejecting the plan to cut the company tax rate to 25 per cent. Now that’s not going to occur for ten years. So really, is it appropriate to be claiming that is actually a saving, because that’s not going to happen for a decade?

LEIGH: Tom, our big budget challenge is over the decade. The Government recognised this themselves when they said that they thought that their tax plan was going to be one that operated over a decade. We can’t have this sort of short-sighted approach that says, “We can fix things for the next few years, but after that we’re gonna kick the problem off.” That’s why we’ve been focusing our costings on the decade to come.

WESTERN AUSTRALIA CAMPAIGN KICK-OFF EVENT

CANNING VALE

FRIDAY, 6 MAY 2016

*** CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY ***

I am delighted be here in Perth, at this kick-off event for the 2016 election. And I'm excited by the coming campaign, because it will be Australia’s chance to answer the big question: what is the difference between the two major parties, and where do they want to take Australia?

In the light of Malcolm Turnbull’s budget for big business, the difference between Labor and the Coalition could not be clearer and therefore this election campaign presents an opportunity to actually talk about the future of our nation: about how Australia should pursue and achieve equality, innovation, and growth.

It was great to sit down during budget week with Michelle Grattan and outline a Labor vision for Australia. You can find the transcript below, or listen on listen online at The Conversation. 

BUDGETS AND POLITICS WITH MICHELLE GRATTAN

GRATTAN: Hello I'm Michelle Grattan and this is our budget podcast. Shadow Assistant Treasurer Andrew Leigh is with us today to talk about Labor's response to the Budget and its alternative. Andrew Leigh just starting with the big picture. In the very broadest terms, what kind of budget would a Labor government have delivered this week?

LEIGH: Michelle we would deliver a budget which face down Australia's big economic challenges. They include declining living standards: income per capita in real net terms has declined 4% since the government came into office. Flagging innovation which has seen too few Australian firms develop new to the world innovations. And rising inequality, where the gap between rich and poor now is the highest it’s been in three-quarters of the century. To answer those challenges requires a budget which doesn't give more to the rich than it does to the poor, and a budget which invests in the productive capacity of the nation rather than taking money out of the infrastructure, schools and hospitals.

WHO GOT SCOMO TO DROP TAX LOOPHOLE ACTION?

This morning’s revelations in The Australian that at the last minute Scott Morrison backed away from plans to effectively address tax avoidance by multinational companies have raised further awkward questions about his budget for big business. Why did Scott Morrison get cold feet, and who bullied him into backing down?

 Prior to his first budget speech, the Treasurer’s Office was briefing journalists that the Government would be reduce the so-called “safe harbour” level in thin capitalisation rules from 60 per cent of total assets to 50 per cent to cut the amount of debt multinational companies can load into their Australian subsidiaries. In fact, a definition of “thin capitalisation law” still sits abandoned in the glossary of terms for the 2016 budget, published online by Treasury.

MULTINATIONALS GET A BIG TAX BREAK AND A PRETEND CRACKDOWN

In the 2014 Budget, the Coalition slashed services for the vulnerable. Two years later, they are giving huge tax breaks to the big end of town.

At the same time, the Coalition want Australians to believe they are getting tough on multinationals.

In fact, Mr Turnbull is so desperate to give a tax cut to multinationals that he’s planning to define them as small businesses.

To understand the multinational tax measures in this budget, you have to go beyond the slogans and pictures to look at the hard numbers.

Tax Avoidance

Last year, Coalition MPs cheered when Tony Abbott told parliament:

“So far the only idea they have come up with is to spend $100 million on the ATO to raise $1 billion. Well, next time they will be telling us to spend $1 billion on the ATO to raise $10 billion. That is the problem. All they can think of is spending more and taxing more. They just cannot help themselves. I actually think that deep down the Leader of the Opposition is better than that, and I would ask him to start demonstrating that now.”

      Question Time, 5 March 2015

E&OE TRANSCRIPT

TV INTERVIEW

CNBC SQUAWK BOX

TUESDAY, 3 MAY 2016

SUBJECT/S: 2016 Budget; Company tax cuts; Labor’s plan to clamp down on multinationals; Reserve bank meeting.

MATTHEW TAYLOR: Welcome back to the show, coming to you live from Canberra. Today of course we are counting down to the Federal Budget that will be handed down at 7:30 AEST tonight. It is the first Budget for Treasurer Scott Morrison and Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull in their respective new capacities. In terms of what's coming out in the Budget, not a lot of detail ahead of time, we do know that the Budget will be centred on small and medium size business with company tax cuts for small and medium enterprise. The definition or the classification of small business is going to change as well, those with a turnover of $5 million or less are going to be included so the net is really being widened on these tax concessions that are going to come through for small business reduced to about 27.5 per cent. We also know there are going to be tax cuts for income earners over $80,000 that is of course to stave off bracket creep, scrapping the budget repair levy, taxes on superannuation contribution for high income earners, an increase in the tobacco excise and also multinational tax avoidance. 

But let's get a bit of a look ahead to what the opposition is thinking may or may not be in the budget and some reaction to those early leaks. I am joined by Andrew Leigh, the Shadow Assistant Treasurer out here on the lawn this morning. Andrew, pleasure to see you thanks very much for chatting to us. I want to kick off on the company tax side point of view, what is the Opposition's response to that? Because broadening the definition of small business so a greater number of small and medium sized organisations going to benefit from a lower tax rate has got to be positive?

ANDREW LEIGH, SHADOW ASSISTANT TREASURER: Well Matt, we'll wait and see exactly what the Government is proposing but the other dimension to this Budget is that it comes down at a time when Australian living standards have fallen and our debt position has worsened. Since the Government came to office, Australian net debt has increased by about $100 billion. Labor's concerned that a company tax cut that was purely funded by increased borrowing could well have an impact on Australia's creditworthiness. We believe it's absolutely critical to maintain Australia's three AAA credit ratings - not just for households but of course for businesses who'd see their interest bills rise under a credit downgrade scenario.