You are here: Home > Blogging
Pages
Categories
- Ageing
- Agriculture
- Arts
- Business
- Coalition Costings
- Coming Events
- Defence & Veterans
- Development
- Disability
- Education
- Employment
- Environment
- Foreign Affairs
- Gender
- Health
- Housing
- Immigration
- Indigenous Australians
- Inequality
- Internet
- Labor history
- Law
- Macroeconomics
- Media
- Media Centre
- National Identity
- NBN
- Parliament
- Podcast
- Public Service
- Randomised trials
- Science
- Social Capital
- Social Policy
- Sport
- Tax
- Trade
- Transport
- Uncategorized
- What I'm reading
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
Jeff Borland’s paper said that Work Choices didn’t shift the Phillips curve- get your facts straight Andrew
.
Quite true. Which is another way of saying that for any given level of inflation, WorkChoices didn’t lower unemployment.
Yep. More particularly, for any given level of unemployment, WorkChoices did not lower the rate of inflation. Excellent interview by the way, keep up the good work.